IVC Ancestry - 2026

Dr. Lavanya Vemsani, PhD

Here is the statement from their Harvard guru after our Rakhigarhi genetic evidence proved it beyond doubt that Indians are indigenous and Indian civilization developed indigenously India. 

For history chronologically development is important not percentages. 

Modern genetic evidence (that is based on what we carry) established that our genetic heritage is derived from our Founding ancestors 73 KYA (Thousand Years Ago). There is a linear evolution from the Founders Male C and Female M to our generation through genetic history. 

The next step was to find Ancient genetic evidence and see if it supports this linear continuity within our genetic history or was it broken by some invasions or migrations. So they got the skeleton that roughly corresponds to that period (1900-1600 BCE). 

They really hoped to find some evidence to support their invasions or migrations theory. But, alas! Our Rakhigarhi grandmother from 16000 years ago showed an indigenously evolved genetic clade U2B2. This genetic clade evolved in India is entrenched and found among a variety of populations including many castes and tribes (see my paper on genetic history to understand the linear evolution and spread of this clade among Indians). 

So, all their hopes of finding some invasion or occupation were dashed to the ground. They retreated their theories of invasions and migrations occupying, destroying our original culture to impose their culture that they claimed to have brought with them. Rakhigarhi grandmother showed them the facts to the contrary. All our culture evolved indigenously from the individuals living in India. 

They began saying “some people like Greeks and Persians came later”. Sure, they might have come. But that’s not an issue because the came with love and admiration for India. They assimilated so much into Indian culture that they learned Sanskrit, became Hindus of Buddhists, and lived happily in India. They are as Indian as indigenous Indians were. Some Hindu temples of 400 BCE and Buddhist stupas contain the dedicatory inscriptions of these Indianized Greeks and Persians. 

So, no! No one from outside conquered or occupied India to impose their culture on India. If anyone came, they came and assimilated. 

The central question here is did any alien group invade or migrate to India between 1900-1600 BCE to alter and impose their culture on India? The resounding answer is in negative. 

Indian civilization is developed indigenously in all its aspects through the centuries meticulous process by the indigenous people living in India. It is a marvelous feat to preserve the Vedas over millennia! 

All their falsehoods are exposed! 

Abrahamism Buster

 If Sharia were an eternal divine revelation, why do we find it written word for word on stone 1,000 years before Moses?

1. Ablution and ritual purity.. an Egyptian theft.

Before the Hebrews knew anything called ablution, the Egyptian priest would wash his hands, face, and feet 5 times a day before entering the temple, shave all the hair on his body, and be forbidden from eating pork and fish without scales, while considering a woman impure during menstruation.

And the Babylonians would bathe after sexual intercourse in the same way, saying: Water purifies the soul.

Suddenly the Torah came and said: Wash this and that, do not eat pork, a woman is impure.

Then the Quran came and said the exact same thing, down to the last detail: "And if you are in a state of major ritual impurity, purify yourselves" "Forbidden to you are carrion, blood, and the flesh of swine."

The God of the universe knows nothing but the hygiene rules of the Nile Valley?

2. Circumcision.. not a sign of the covenant, but a sign of slaves.

Circumcision did not begin with Abraham. Archaeologists have found a 5,000-year-old Egyptian mummy that was circumcised. And they found an inscription in the temple of Saqqara from 2400 BC depicting a mass circumcision.

Among the Egyptians, circumcision was a ritual for priests and slaves, a sign that you belonged to the temple. Among some African tribes, it was a rite of passage into adulthood.

The Hebrews in Egypt took the custom of their masters and turned it into a "covenant with God."

And the Muslims took it from them, even though the Quran never mentioned it even once. An entire religion cuts off a part of a child's body who knows nothing, based on a 5,000-year-old pharaonic custom.

3. Retaliation and prescribed punishments.. a copy of the Code of Hammurabi.

"An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth" - this is not revelation. This is Law 196 in the Code of Hammurabi, written on a basalt stone in Babylon in 1754 BC, 1,000 years before the Torah.

"Whoever kills shall be killed, whoever steals shall have his hand cut off, whoever commits adultery shall be stoned" - all of these were in the Code of Hammurabi, the Assyrian law, and Hittite law.

The only difference: Hammurabi said honestly: This is my law, I, the king, established it to organize my state.

But the priests said: This is God's law, whoever objects to it is an unbeliever.

Is the God of the universe incapable of inventing a new punishment? Is all he has the ability to imitate a Babylonian king?

4. The logic that demolishes everything:

If Sharia were from God, why is it preoccupied with trivial things and ignores matters of life and death?

God in Sharia intervenes in: how you enter the bathroom, which foot you use, how you sleep, how you trim your beard, what you eat, and whether you wear gold or not.

But he is completely silent about: slavery, he did not forbid it. Marital rape, he did not forbid it. Child marriage, he did not forbid it. Burning people alive, he did not forbid it. Political tyranny, he did not forbid it.

A god who cares about the length of your beard and does not care about a person's freedom? This is not a god. This is a nomadic priest who wants to control every detail of your life, even your entering the bathroom.

Sharia is not morality. Sharia is a surveillance system.

The king used to watch you with the army, the priest invented a Sharia that watches you even when you are alone in your room.

First they stole the story.

Second they stole the god.

Third they stole your fate after death.

Fourth they stole your daily life and called it halal and haram.

All that remains is you.

The fifth post will be the last and the most dangerous: Why did the miracle die? Why did all the miracles happen in a time when there were no cameras or documentation, and stop suddenly the moment humans invented the camera and science?

Dr. Khazal Al-Majidi is a historian, researcher, archaeologist, and scholar of the history of religions, as well as an Iraqi poet and playwright, born in the city of Kirkuk in Iraq in 1951 and currently residing in the Netherlands.